A New Form of Entertainment, A New Form of Exploitation
"Panem et circenses" – bread and circuses – was the formula used by Roman emperors to distract and pacify the masses. Today, we face a modern incarnation that's infinitely more sophisticated. The circuses are now digital, the bread is dopamine hits, and the emperors are tech conglomerates harvesting every moment of our attention.
I've spent years watching the evolution of our digital landscape from various vantage points – as an AI researcher, an entrepreneur, a professor, Chief Innovation Officer at the FDIC, and as an observer of how technology reshapes society. What I'm witnessing now is the industrial-scale automation of human attention capture and data harvesting, all powered by increasingly sophisticated AI systems.
Let me walk you through the Digital Colosseum we've built, where we're all gladiators whether we recognize it or not, and where the price of admission isn't just free – it's you.
Welcome to the Arena
Consider TikTok. It seems harmless enough: short, engaging videos tailored precisely to your interests. The entrance fee? Zero dollars. Just download the app, create an account, and you're instantly connected to an endless stream of entertainment.
But this Colosseum operates differently than its Roman predecessor. In ancient Rome, spectators paid to watch the gladiators fight. In our Digital Colosseum, you are simultaneously both spectator and gladiator. Every swipe, every like, every moment your eyes linger on content – these are the swings of your digital sword. The algorithm watches, learns, and adapts, serving you content with increasingly surgical precision. The precision of this algorithm is so efficient, you hardly remember that you’re swinging a sword. You hardly register the swipes, likes and attention you give to the platform. Before you know it, an hour of your day is gone.
What most users don't realize is that they have entered combat the moment they accepted the terms of service. The weapons? Digital. The battleground? Your attention. The prize?
Your data, your time, and ultimately, pieces of your identity and influencing your behavior.
The Automated Harvesting Machine
Behind the scenes of our digital arenas lies an increasingly sophisticated AI infrastructure designed for one primary purpose: to automate the process of extracting maximum value from human attention.
This is industrialization in its purest form – but instead of automating the production of physical goods, we're automating the capture and monetization of human behavior. Just as the industrial revolution mechanized manual labor, this AI revolution is mechanizing cognitive labor – specifically, the labor of understanding, predicting, and manipulating human decision-making.
The scale is staggering. Every day, billions of people generate trillions of data points across social platforms. No human team could possibly process this information. Enter machine learning systems – constantly running, constantly learning, constantly optimizing for engagement metrics. These systems don't sleep, don't tire, and don't question their objectives.
What makes this truly industrial is the systematization and scale. Companies aren't just collecting data; they're building automated pipelines that:
Capture behavioral data at unprecedented levels of detail
Process this data through increasingly sophisticated AI models
Generate personalized content designed to maximize engagement
Deploy this content through optimized delivery mechanisms
Measure outcomes and feed results back into the system
This isn't just automation – it's a self-improving cycle of automation. Each interaction you have with these platforms makes the system slightly better at capturing the next interaction. The machine learns not just what content you like, but precisely when, where, and how to deliver it for maximum impact. Previously, it was your shopping behavior, now who you vote for, and who knows what in the future?
The Illusion of Choice
The most insidious aspect of this Digital Colosseum is the illusion of choice it presents. Romans attending the real Colosseum knew they were there for spectacle. Today's digital citizens often believe they're making free, informed choices or opinions. But are we really choosing? Or are we being expertly guided through a carefully constructed labyrinth of "choices" designed to maximize data extraction?
When you open TikTok, you're not just deciding to watch videos – you're entering an environment meticulously engineered to keep you watching. Every element of the interface, from the friction-free scrolling to the perfectly timed dopamine hits, has been optimized through millions of A/B tests and billions of data points.
The modern reality is that AI systems are now sufficiently advanced to predict what will capture your attention better than you can yourself. They know what will make you angry, what will make you laugh, what will make you pause mid-scroll – often with greater accuracy than your own self-knowledge.
This represents a fundamental power asymmetry. Individual users armed only with their limited human cognition are facing institutional-grade AI systems trained on the behavioral data of billions. It's like bringing a knife to a gunfight, except most people don't even realize there's a fight happening.
The Terms of Digital Populism
When we talk about populism in the traditional political sense, we refer to a rhetorical and political approach that pits "the people" against "the elite." Digital populism functions similarly but with a technological twist. Platforms position themselves as democratizing forces giving voice to the everyday person while simultaneously operating as vast data extraction mechanisms.
The terms of service you accept when joining these platforms are, in essence, the terms of digital populism:
You're promised free access to a global platform
You're promised the ability to be heard
You're promised connection to others
You're promised personalized content
In exchange, you surrender:
Comprehensive behavioral data
Attention (the scarcest resource in the information age)
Agency over your information environment
Potentially, aspects of your cognitive autonomy
This bargain is rarely made explicit. Instead, it's buried in terms of service documents that research shows less than 1% of users read. And even those who do read them often lack the technical literacy to understand the implications.
The result is a form of digital populism that feels empowering but actually and concentrates power in the hands of those who control the platforms and the AI systems that drive them.
The AI Arbitrage of Human Experience
What's truly unprecedented about our current moment is the emergence of what I call "AI arbitrage of human experience." Let me explain what I mean.
In financial markets, arbitrage occurs when someone exploits price differences between markets to make a profit. What's happening with AI and data collection is conceptually similar: companies are exploiting the gap between the value individuals place on their data and attention (often near zero) and the actual market value of that data when aggregated, processed, and deployed at scale (enormously valuable).
AI is the technology that makes this arbitrage not just possible but extraordinarily profitable. It allows companies to:
Collect seemingly worthless individual data points
Aggregate them into valuable datasets
Process these datasets to extract patterns and insights
Deploy these insights to capture even more data
Repeat the process with increasing efficiency
This arbitrage is becoming increasingly automated, with AI systems handling every step of the process from collection to deployment. The result is an ever-widening gap between the value extracted from users and the compensation (typically just "free" services) provided in return.
The economics are simple but profound: when the marginal cost of data processing approaches zero (thanks to AI automation), but the marginal value of aggregated data remains high, the incentive to collect as much data as possible becomes overwhelming. Have you felt like more and more online services (apps, websites, etc.) ask you to put in more information?
That’s not by accident; it’s by design.
Digital Gladiators in an AI-Driven Arena
In the Roman Colosseum, gladiators fought with physical weapons for the entertainment of crowds. In our Digital Colosseum, we fight with likes, shares, and comments for the benefit of algorithms. You think you are liking the cute puppy, but you’re just increasing the value of a row in a database.
The comparison may seem hyperbolic but consider the psychological reality: platforms are engineered to trigger competitive instincts, to reward performative behavior, to create conflict, to create winners and losers in the attention economy. Every time you post content, you're entering the arena, with AI systems determining whether your content will be amplified or buried.
What makes this particularly concerning is that the rules of combat are both opaque and constantly changing. Algorithm updates can fundamentally alter the dynamics overnight, leaving digital gladiators scrambling to adapt to new conditions they don't fully understand.
And unlike Roman gladiators, who at least knew they were in combat, most digital participants don't recognize the competitive environment they've entered or the ways in which AI systems are mediating their experience.
Breaking Free from the Digital Colosseum
So, what can be done? Are we doomed to be perpetual combatants in an AI-driven attention arena? I don't believe so but breaking free requires both individual and collective action.
At the individual level:
Cultivate algorithmic awareness – recognize when your behavior is being shaped
Practice intentional technology use rather than passive consumption
Regularly audit and adjust your digital relationships
Invest in privacy-enhancing tools and practices
Value your attention as the precious resource it is
At the collective level:
Demand regulatory frameworks that address automated data harvesting
Support alternative technological models (open source, decentralized, user-owned)
Invest in digital literacy education at all levels
Create social countermeasures to engagement-maximizing design
The challenges are significant, but not insurmountable. The first step is recognition – understanding that beneath the seemingly free and democratic veneer of our digital platforms lies an increasingly automated system of data extraction that operates with industrial efficiency.
The Choice Before Us
We stand at a critical juncture in the evolution of our relationship with technology. AI systems are accelerating the automation of attention capture and data harvesting, creating a Digital Colosseum that's increasingly difficult to escape.
The entrance ticket remains free, but the true cost – in terms of our data, our attention, and potentially our autonomy – continues to rise. By accepting the terms of service, we've been accepting the terms of a new kind of digital populism that promises empowerment while facilitating unprecedented levels of data extraction.
But recognition brings possibility. By understanding the dynamics of the Digital Colosseum, we can begin to make more informed choices about our participation. We can demand better terms, build alternative systems, and reclaim elements of our digital sovereignty.
The gladiatorial combat may continue, but perhaps we can change the nature of the contest – or choose not to fight at all.
Connect with us: Substack, LinkedIn, Bluesky, X, Website
To learn more about the services we offer, please visit our product page.
This article was written by Sultan Meghji, CEO of Frontier Foundry. Visit his LinkedIn here.
This post was edited by Thomas Morin, Marketing Analyst at Frontier Foundry. View his LinkedIn here.